National Energy Board – 2013-14 Departmental Performance Report – Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.
Supplementary Information (Tables)
Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy | |||
---|---|---|---|
Overview of the Federal Government's Approach to Sustainable Development | |||
The Federal Sustainable Development Strategy (FSDS) 2013-16, tabled on November 4, 2013, guides the Government of Canada’s sustainable development activities, as required by the Federal Sustainable Development Act (FSDA). In keeping with the objectives of the FSDA, to make environmental decision-making more transparent and accountable to Parliament, the National Energy Board supports the implementation of the FSDS through the activities found in this departmental strategy. Accordingly, this Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy (DSDS) presents the results for commitments for Theme I – Addressing Climate Change and Air Quality, Theme II – Maintaining Water Quality and Availability, Theme III – Protecting Nature and Canadians, within the context of the 2013-16 FSDS. This DSDS also provides the results for Theme IV – Shrinking the Environmental Footprint – Beginning with Government based on the 2010-13 FSDS. |
|||
Themes I-III: Department/Agency-led Targets | |||
The NEB is not responsible for leading any target for Themes I-III of the FSDS 2013-16. However, the NEB contributed to Theme III – Protecting Nature and Canadians, as denoted by the visual identifier below. These contributions are components of the following Program and are further explained in Section II of the DPR:
|
|||
FSDS Goal | FSDS Performance Indicator | FSDS Target | FSDS Performance Status |
n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Themes I-III: Implementation Strategies | |||
The NEB’s contributions to Theme III – Protecting Nature and Canadians, is a component of the following Program:
The NEB‘s decision-making process includes a consideration of the FSDS goals and targets through the strategic environmental assessment (SEA). An SEA for policy, plan or program proposals includes an analysis of the impacts of the proposal on the environment, including on the FSDS goals and targets. The results of SEAs are made public when an initiative is announced or approved, demonstrating that environmental factors were integrated into the decision-making process. |
|||
Theme IV: Implementation Strategies | |||
Green Building Targets | |||
As of April 1, 2012, and pursuant to departmental strategic frameworks, new construction and build-to-lease projects, and major renovation projects, will achieve an industry-recognized level of high environmental performance.[8] (Target 8.1 from 2010-13 FSDS) |
|||
Performance Measure | Performance Status | ||
Number of completed new construction, build-to-lease, and major renovation projects in the given fiscal year, according to the departmental strategic framework. | n/a | ||
Number of completed new construction, build-to-lease, and major renovation projects that have achieved an industry-recognized level of high environmental performance in the given fiscal year, according to the departmental strategic framework. | n/a | ||
Existence of a strategic framework. | No | ||
Strategies and/or Comments : Reported by PWGSC | |||
As of April 1, 2012, and pursuant to departmental strategic frameworks, existing crown buildings over 1000 m² will be assessed for environmental performance using an industry-recognized assessment tool.[9] (Target 8.2 from 2010-13 FSDS) |
|||
Performance Measure | Performance Status | ||
Number of buildings over 1000 m², according to the departmental strategic framework. | n/a | ||
Percentage of buildings over 1000 m² in the given fiscal year that have been assessed using an industry-recognized assessment tool, according to the departmental strategic framework. | n/a | ||
Existence of a strategic framework. | No | ||
Strategies and/or Comments : Reported by PWGSC | |||
As of April 1, 2012, and pursuant to departmental strategic frameworks, new lease or lease renewal projects over 1000 m², where the Crown is the major lessee, will be assessed for environmental performance using an industry-recognized assessment tool.[10] (Target 8.3 from 2010-13 FSDS) |
|||
Performance Measure | Performance Status | ||
Number of completed lease and lease renewal projects over 1000 m² in the given fiscal year, according to the departmental strategic framework. | n/a | ||
Number of completed lease and lease renewal projects over 1000 m² that were assessed using an industry-recognized assessment tool in the given fiscal year, according to the departmental strategic framework. | n/a | ||
Existence of a strategic framework. | No | ||
Strategies and/or Comments : Reported by PWGSC | |||
As of April 1, 2012, and pursuant to departmental strategic frameworks, fit-up and refit projects will achieve an industry-recognized level of high environmental performance.[11] (Target 8.4 from 2010-13 FSDS) |
|||
Performance Measure | Performance Status | ||
Number of completed fit-up and refit projects in the given fiscal year, according to the departmental strategic framework. | n/a | ||
Number of completed fit-up and refit projects that have achieved an industry-recognized level of high environmental performance in the given fiscal year, according to the departmental strategic framework. | n/a | ||
Existence of a strategic framework. | No | ||
Strategies and/or Comments: Reported by PWGSC | |||
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Target | |||
The federal government will take action now to reduce levels of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from its operations to match the national target of 17% below 2005 by 2020. (Target 8.5 from 2010-13 FSDS) |
|||
Performance Measure | Performance Status | ||
Departmental GHG reduction target: Percentage of absolute reduction in GHG emissions by FY 2020-21, relative to FY 2005-06. | n/a | ||
Departmental GHG emissions in FY 2005-06, in kilotons of CO2 equivalent. | n/a | ||
Departmental GHG emissions in the given fiscal year, in kilotons of CO2 equivalent. | n/a | ||
Change in departmental GHG emissions from FY 2005-06 to the end of the given fiscal year, expressed as a percentage. | n/a | ||
Existence of an implementation plan to reduce GHG emissions. | n/a | ||
Surplus Electronic and Electrical Equipment Target | |||
By March 31, 2014, each department will reuse or recycle all surplus electronic and electrical equipment (EEE) in an environmentally sound and secure manner. (Target 8.6 from 2010-13 FSDS) |
|||
Performance Measure | Performance Status | ||
Existence of an implementation plan for the disposal of all departmentally generated EEE. | Achieved. All EEE is disposed either through Computers for Schools, donated to non-profit organizations or sent to approved environmental sites for recycling. | ||
Total number of departmental locations with an EEE implementation plan fully implemented, expressed as a percentage of all locations, by the end of the given fiscal year. | 100% | ||
Printing Unit Reduction Target | |||
By March 31, 2013, each department will achieve an 8:1 average ratio of office employees to printing units. Departments will apply the target where building occupancy levels, security considerations, and space configuration allow. (Target 8.7 from 2010-13 FSDS) |
|||
Performance Measure | Performance Status | ||
Ratio of departmental office employees to printing units in fiscal year 2010-11, where building occupancy levels, security considerations and space configuration allow. (Optional) | n/a | ||
Ratio of departmental office employees to printing units at the end of the given fiscal year, where building occupancy levels, security considerations and space configuration allow. | Ratio 1:18 (# of printers = 25) (# of employees = 470) |
||
Paper Consumption Target | |||
By March 31, 2014, each department will reduce internal paper consumption per office employee by 20%. Each department will establish a baseline between 2005-06 and 2011-12, and an applicable scope. (Target 8.8 from 2010-13 FSDS) |
|||
Performance Measure | Performance Status | ||
Number of sheets of internal office paper purchased or consumed per office employee in the selected baseline year, according to the departmental scope. | 2013 was the first year of recording paper consumption. | ||
Cumulative reduction (or increase) in paper consumption per office employee in the given fiscal year, expressed as a percentage, relative to the selected baseline year. | 2,778,000 sheets of paper consumed by 425 people. | ||
Strategies and/or Comments: The NEB orders paper for its large document production centre and for printer and copier use throughout the organization. The total amount of paper is for the entire use of the NEB, including the printing of publications for the Board. Publications make up a large portion of the paper consumption. | |||
Green Meetings Target | |||
By March 31, 2012, each department will adopt a guide for greening meetings. (Target 8.9 from 2010-13 FSDS) |
|||
Performance Measure | Performance Status | ||
Presence of a green meetings guide. | Guide is in the process of being formalized and published on web site. Target date December 31, 2014. | ||
Green Procurement Targets | |||
Strategies and/or Comments
|
|||
Reporting on the Purchase of Offset Credits | |||
Mandatory reporting on the purchase of greenhouse gas emissions offset credits, according to the Policy Framework for Offsetting Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Major International Events. | |||
Performance Measure | Performance Status | ||
Quantity of emissions offset in the given fiscal year. | n/a | ||
Additional Departmental/Agency Sustainable Development Activities and Initiatives | |||
n/a | |||
Sustainable Development Management System | |||
n/a | |||
Strategic Environmental Assessment | |||
During 2013-14 reporting cycle, the National Energy Board considered the environmental effects of initiatives subject to the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals, as part of its decision-making processes. Through the strategic environmental assessment (SEA) process, departmental / agency proposals were found to have positive effects on the 2013-16 FSDS goals and targets in Theme(s) III – Protecting Nature and Canadians, and the 2010-13 FSDS for Theme IV – Shrinking the Environmental Footprint – Beginning with Government. |
- Date modified: